We have followed the Rambus saga for some time. My last post linked to the Federal Trade Commission’s decision holding that Rambus had engaged in illegal monopolization and linking to an extended discussion by my partner, Andy Updegrove.
Today, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the FTC, holding that Rambus was not guilty of monopolization. Decision here. More to follow, as we have a chance to review this decision.
Previous post: Treble Damages Now Mandatory Under Massachusetts Wage Statute
Next post: Behind The Scenes at Bear Stearns
I am a founding partner at the Boston law firm of Gesmer Updegrove LLP. This blog focuses on my practice areas: IP, business and antitrust law, as well as any other topic (legal or otherwise) that strikes my fancy. I've also tried to make the blog (and my scribd.com page, below), a resource on practice in the Massachusetts state and federal courts.
My Recent Scribd Uploads First Circuit Court of Appeals CAFC Opinions Massachusetts U.S. District Court
