Select Page

Mass Law Blog

Intellectual property and business litigation, Massachusetts and nationally
Written by humans

Lee Gesmer’s Mass Law Blog began in 2005, and contains almost 600 posts. The site initially focused on Massachusetts law, but today it follows business and intellectual property law nation-wide. The site is hosted by Gesmer Updegrove LLP, a law firm based in Boston, Massachusetts. The firm represents startup and established companies in the areas of litigation, transactions (including financings, mergers and acquisitions), IP rights, taxation, employment law, standards consortia, business counseling and open source development projects and foundations. You can find a summary of the firm’s services here. To learn how Gesmer Updegrove can help you, contact: Lee Gesmer

Commonwealth v. Meta: When Platform Design Becomes the Plaintiff’s Best Theory

I've written about Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 many times over the years on this blog, and the arc those posts trace is worth pausing on before turning to where the law stands today. In Section 230 Supreme Court Argument in Gonzalez v. Google: Keep An Eye on Justice Thomas and Supreme Court Will Decide Whether Google's Algorithm-Based Recommendations are Protected Under Section 230, both from 2023, I described Section 230 as "an almost insurmountable defensive barrier...

read more
Is Embedding Someone Else’s Image Copyright Infringement? The Fifth Circuit May Finally Tell Us

Is Embedding Someone Else’s Image Copyright Infringement? The Fifth Circuit May Finally Tell Us

On June 2, 2026, the Fifth Circuit heard argument in Emmerich Newspapers, Inc. v. Particle Media, Inc., the first time a federal court of appeals outside the Ninth Circuit has had to decide whether embedding content that lives on someone else's server infringes the copyright owner's exclusive right of public display. I took up that question in 2018 (Is In-Line Linking Illegal Now?) and again in 2022, in a post titled "Is 'Photo Embedding' Copyright Infringement? It Depends on the Court." My...

read more
IBR and Fair Use: What Congress Needs to Fix in the Pro Codes Act

IBR and Fair Use: What Congress Needs to Fix in the Pro Codes Act

Lee Gesmer and Andrew Updegrove In 2023, we wrote about the D.C. Circuit's decision in American Society for Testing and Materials v. Public.Resource.Org (ASTM II), which held that a nonprofit organization's free online publication of technical standards incorporated by reference (IBR) into law constituted copyright fair use. We expressed concern that the decision underestimated the threat to the delicate symbiotic relationship between standards development organizations (SDOs) and the...

read more
Why Bother With the DMCA? The Supreme Court’s Sony v. Cox Decision and Its Consequences

Why Bother With the DMCA? The Supreme Court’s Sony v. Cox Decision and Its Consequences

This post is the third in a series following Sony Music Entertainment v. Cox Communications through the courts. In May 2024 I wrote about the Fourth Circuit's decision, which reversed a $1 billion jury verdict against Cox on vicarious liability grounds while affirming a finding of contributory infringement, and sent the case back for a new trial on damages. Last November, when the Supreme Court agreed to hear Cox's appeal, I warned that the stakes extended far beyond the parties themselves. On...

read more
The Massachusetts Noncompetition Agreement Act and Nonsolicitation Agreements: Miele v. Foundation Medicine

The Massachusetts Noncompetition Agreement Act and Nonsolicitation Agreements: Miele v. Foundation Medicine

When the Massachusetts Noncompetition Agreement Act (MNAA) took effect in October 2018, I described the law in detail and wrote that employers and employees were entering “a new era” in noncompete law. The statute imposed formalities, created new employee protections, and limited the enforceable duration of noncompetes. But it also drew a set of carefully worded exclusions - most notably for nonsolicitation agreements. I predicted that those exclusions would become critical as employers...

read more
Sony v. Cox Heads to the Supreme Court

Sony v. Cox Heads to the Supreme Court

Update: On March 26, 2026 the Supreme Court decided this case in favor of Cox. The Court held that an internet service provider would be liable for infringing content posted by a third party only when it induced users' infringement or provided a service "tailored to infringement." **************** Can your internet provider be held liable for what you download? That's the question the Supreme Court will wrestle with on December 1, when it hears Sony Music Entertainment v. Cox Communications -...

read more

Categories

Top Rated Attorney

Lee T. Gesmer
Rated by Super Lawyers


loading ...

This site is hosted by Gesmer Updegrove LLP, a technology law firm based in Boston, Massachusetts. You can find a summary of our services here. To learn how GU can help you, contact:
Lee Gesmer